Archives:
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  •  

     

     


    August 15, 2008

    An Olympian Voice

    “To me,” said a well-known authority on education, “these athletics are the devil.”

    To me no form of athletics is the devil, but that of paying other people to be athletic for you; and this, unhappily – and partly, I believe, through our neglect to provide our elementary schools with decent playgrounds – is the form affected nowadays by large and increasing crowds of spectators…I believe all this professional sport likely to be as demoralizing for us…as were the gladiatorial shows for Rome, and I cannot help attributing to it some measure of that combativeness at second hand – that itch to fight anyone and everyone by proxy – which, abetted by a cheap press, has for many years been our curse.

    Arthur Quiller-Couch, 1906

    August 3, 2008

    A Room of One’s Own (reprise)

    Mr. Toad and all his riverside friends are a hundred years old this year. This is the kind of opening sentence that divides readers instantly into two groups. One group (probably the majority) will be completely mystified. The others will get a faraway look in their eyes, and begin to mutter: “Boop-boop.”

    Mr. Toad is the most prominent and certainly the loudest character in The Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Graham, which was published in 1908. Either you were brought up on this book or you were not. If you were you can scarcely have forgotten Toad and his long suffering companions, Water Rat, Mole, and Badger, who live an idyllic life by the river and in the Wild Wood, interrupted by bursts of wild excitement (usually precipitated by Toad).

    Toad has enthusiasms, one of which is the motor car (“Boop-boop”), and his gentler and more sensible friends try to save him from himself. Some people adore the book, others find it fey and silly. But it made an impression on a lot of children, including me, because the animal characters are so good natured and sympathetic.

    Until recently, when I read a biographical article about the author Kenneth Graham, I had not grasped another and more hidden appeal of The Wind in the Willows. The characters are all solitary males who love their little homes. There is an affecting passage where Mole, who has been enjoying all kinds of adventures on the river, catches the scent of his own underground burrow and is overcome with homesickness.

    It seems that Kenneth Graham had a lifelong dream of a little room of his own where he could shut himself away from the world. He even went looking for it in London, believing it must exist somewhere. I certainly had such a fantasy when I was young. It was very vivid, and reading about Kenneth Graham brought it back to me. I rather suspect that it is a common dream, the idea that if we could only shut out the clutter and noise of the world for a while we could calm down and find “It,” whatever It is.

    The nearest thing I’ve found to Mole’s burrow is a room in a big, anonymous hotel, which is why I am writing this on the twenty fifth floor of the Sheraton in Boston. Ratty and Mole, Badger and Toad and Howard Hughes, all had the right idea.

    With acknowledgements to Richard Ingrams

    July 28, 2008

    Lost in Translation

    A very entertaining and intelligent novel by Jonathan Miles, Dear American Airlines, is couched in the form of an increasingly rambling letter of complaint, which eventually tells the entire story of the letter-writer’s miserable life, leading up to the moment when he is stuck in Chicago O’Hare Airport by a flight cancellation.

    This is the best novel I’ve read for a while. It managed to be both laugh-out-loud funny and suicidally sad. There is a novel within a novel, which Bernie the protagonist is translating from Polish, and this allows a subtext of reflections about how impossible it is to truly understand other languages and people.

    This phrase caught my attention:

    “Everything is translation, and we are all lost in it.”

    In other words, life is a constant struggle to understand, a perpetual language test, which we all fail. Is this as true as I think it is?

    July 12, 2008

    The Romance of Solitude

    “Alone, alone, all, all alone” cried the ancient mariner in Coleridge’s famous poem. So he was, and from a literary point of view he made the most of the experience. It’s rare to be alone, especially these days. Today’s ancient mariner is more likely to be on a cruise ship with two thousand other ancient mariners.

    But sometimes we find ourselves, in the inescapable cliché, alone in a crowd. It happened to me recently when I spent five days on my own in Paris. I hadn’t been alone in Paris for fifty years.

    There’s a great difference between just being somewhere and being alone in the same place. With your familiar and loved companion(s) travel is disciplined by routines and narratives that you have come to share. Alone, it’s just you and them, the strangers. So you are twice as alert. Every experience is heightened, and every encounter is potentially special.

    It seems to me that some of the very best travel memoirs have been written by lone travelers like Robert Louis Stevenson and Paul Theroux. A picaresque travel fiction requires a comic sidekick (Sancho Panza, Dr. Pangloss) to push the plot along. But a pure travel story is more like a pilgrimage – a solitary adventure that mixes observation with reflection.

    Some people cope better than others with being alone. The worst mistake is to use time alone to think about yourself, which can drive you straight into therapy. As John Barth observed: “Self-knowledge is always bad news.” The great opportunity for the solitary traveler is not to cultivate his or her own neuroses but to give one hundred per-cent attention to new people and places.

    We humans are a sociable species. That’s how we survive. We have the self-protective herd instinct that tells us to conform, follow the leader, and go with the crowd. This behavior can be seen in its purest form in your local high school, where ‘fitting in’ is practically a religion.

    What makes us different from cows or lemmings is that we can and do break away from the herd, and think our separate thoughts. We are bees with a perspective on the hive, which allows us to evolve and to create. This also gives us a headache.

    The moments when we are separated from the swarm, mentally or physically, are precious, potentially creative spaces, when we can actually reflect on what (for want of a better phrase) I have to call the meaning of life. Even though Monty Python made an international joke out of it, the meaning of life is still a pretty important question.

    We can travel to the ends of the earth, but even the deserts and mountains are crowded. “Remote” Mount Everest is a major tourist attraction. Resorts ironically offer “Relaxation and solitude,” when you and they know that thousands of others will be sharing the same solitary experience. Solitude, when we find it, is all in the mind.

    This may be what happens to people who hide away in remote writers’ colonies, hoping that peace and quiet will bring the inspiration that everyday life had failed to bring. Thoreau wrote these famous lines about solitude:

    “I never found the companion that was so companionable as solitude. We are for the most part more lonely when we go abroad among men than when we stay in our chambers. A man thinking or working is always alone, let him be where he will. Solitude is not measured by the miles of space that intervene between a man and his fellows. The really diligent student in one of the crowded hives of Cambridge College is as solitary as a dervish in the desert.”Henry David Thoreau: Walden

    Yet Thoreau was constantly involved with people, with nature, and with his own philosophy. He was no more solitary than I was in Paris, surrounded by eight million people and holding surreal conversations in bad French with quite a few of them. No great literary insights came out of this, but there was never a dull moment.

    June 27, 2008

    Return to Civilization

    This so-called blog has been silent for over a month, because I was spending some time in what Donald Rumsfeld dismissed as “Old Europe,” and deliberately left my laptop at home. Who wants to spend their vacation looking for wireless hotspots and deleting hundreds of pointless e-mails? I took my first real look at Belgium, then spent a week in Paris, and ended up in England. I have to agree that Europe really is old, but I can’t decide how bad that is. Ancient buildings do get in the way of redevelopment, and bicycles are a problem for car drivers. Also, there is a certain lack of hysteria in the air. Europeans have a bad habit of taking time off from work and relaxing (both French and Spanish governments are trying to put an end to this pernicious habit).

    More news from Europe later, but here’s an observation (or rather two) which seem to sum up the good news and the bad news for writers. Video and internet culture are sweeping away the printed word over there, just as they are here. But consider these two apparently contradictory news stories.

      Of the 86,000 new books published in France last year, as many as 58,000 sold just 18 copies on average.

      The famous English bookseller Blackwells has installed an “Expresso Book Machine,” which will print and bind your own personal copy of any book in about seven minutes. This vastly reduces the stock that the shop needs to carry.

    On second thought, these two stories may not be contradictory after all. We may be entering an age of boutique books, which may not be entirely a bad thing.

    May 20, 2008

    Eight Minutes of Fame

    I’ve always been told that I have the ideal face for radio. Check it out on the home page. So it was with some misgivings that I accepted an invitation to be interviewed on a local TV station last Saturday. Television and I have never got along, although I’ve done a few modest programs over the years. My very first appearance on the box was in Britain in 1969, when I was teaching at one of the most revolutionary universities in the nation. A BBC camera crew sought me out for my comments, in the midst of the chaos. When the program was aired I looked like the proverbial deer caught in the headlights. What was even more embarrassing is that total strangers recognized me for weeks afterwards. This never happens with radio.

    The setting for this most recent venture into TV was as bizarre as the event itself – a huge, brand new, empty house in that trendy and expensive part of Long Island called The Hamptons. (As a footnote, you might like to know that houses costing over $10 million in the Hamptons are still selling well, but the cheap places are not, according to The New York Times.) The interview was shot from the terrace, looking out over the swimming pool and the (fairly distant) ocean.

    This background was more vivid and lively than it sounds. A group of singers and male and female dancers from Rajasthan had arrived for a later program. (Yes, I know, I had to look it up too – it’s a large state in the north of India). They wore exotic, brilliantly colored costumes. Also present were a number of very pretty young ladies who were wearing almost no costumes at all, and who may or may not have been there for another TV program, or just for decoration. They made a strange contrast with the veiled and heavily covered female Indian dancers. This circus of beauty and color was swirling around just behind my back as I tried to concentrate on the interview.

    The TV people were absolutely charming to me, but they obviously had little experience dealing with us invisible radio types. They proposed that I should see the make-up girl, and were puzzled when I refused, saying: “Too little, too late.” They asked which was my “best side,” and I truthfully told them that I don’t have one. In the end they sat me down in front of three cameras (which seemed excessive), and the interview rolled on smoothly. We talked about radio essays and classical music, and I managed to keep my eyes on the interviewer, except when they drifted off towards the decorative young ladies.

    About halfway through our chat I remembered that it doesn’t matter what you say on TV. Viewers may be paying attention to your expression, or the background, or the interviewer, but never to your words. This recollection allowed me to relax and talk nonsense. Nobody noticed.

    When it was over I joined the Rajasthan dancers at the reception area for a while, and then slipped quietly away. The driveway was packed with high end BMWs, Jaguars, and even a Bentley, so I was glad I had left my old Honda behind a hedge just outside.

    It is always interesting to get a glimpse of other worlds and other lifestyles. Sometimes we may feel the sting of envy. More often, in my experience, we do not.

    May 10, 2008

    Computer Madness

    Computers must be the most common cause of writer’s block. The block is not in the mind but in the machine. When they first arrived in the 1980s computers seemed like such a gift. It was gloriously easy to edit, change, copy and send our work. Those of us who had grown up in the age of manual typewriters and carbon copies felt liberated by the new technology.

    It didn’t last long. The computer industry soon added functions, and features, and programs, and more and more programs, until I’m sure that even Bill Gates himself doesn’t understand how Windows works, when it works.

    So you can guess that I bought a new computer, partly because the old one had started acting strangely and partly because I needed more hard disk space. The new computer is a top brand, and expensive, and looks very nice. The only small problem is that nothing works properly. It won’t accept transferred files, it crashes with deadly regularity, and a different function vanishes every day. It took a month to get my files into it. Now, after a three hour telephone session with a jolly fellow called Ranjeesh in Bombay or somewhere, I’m told that I have to re-install Windows - which means wiping out all the files I have transferred. Another small problem: the new computer refuses to transfer the files, to a CD or anything else. Stalemate. Total frustration.

    From what I hear from my friends this is fairly typical. Is it time for a whole new concept in computers - machines that actually work?

    May 3, 2008

    The Mentor

    I never had a mentor, although I suspect that he or she would have done me a lot of good. A mentor might have improved my writing, and my thinking, and perhaps even my life. There have been editors and friends, and a few wives, who have commented on my work over the decades, but not one of them took me on as a personal project.

    This is no more than justice, because I have been a reluctant mentor myself. While nobody took me on, I equally avoided taking anyone else on. There have been perhaps half a dozen people in my teaching life who clearly and obviously wanted me to be their mentor – some of them were writers and some were students of other subjects. But I never plunged in, and it’s hard to say why. Even before sexual harassment became an issue for teachers I was wary of close, personal involvement with students. The classroom and the seminar were fine. The one-on-one relationship always seemed more problematic, and even dangerous.

    This is not entirely crazy because the mentor relationship is wide open to exploitation. Some mentees (if there is such a word) are looking for father figures or gurus, while some mentors are looking for sex or power. It’s an explosive combination, especially in the form of an older male mentoring a younger female, and I have felt the heat of those explosions from the fringes of the battlefield.

    The limits of mentoring are vague. The word means guide and adviser, as the original Mentor was guide and adviser to Odysseus. It’s relatively simple to give advice about writing, for example, although even that can be fraught with emotion. But suppose personal things spill over, as they usually do? A mentor is thrust into the role of amateur therapist, and can do a lot of damage.

    These reservations sound rather cowardly, and I don’t think they would ever have dissuaded me from being a mentor in real life. The underlying problem was that, lacking any mentors myself, I never learned to mentor anybody else. Knowledge and experience are part of the job description, but there must be more to it than that. A mentor must know how to plunge into another life and (in a sense) live it vicariously without taking it over. A too strong mentor is more like a puppet master, and a too weak one is not much use at all. It was a line I never knew how to walk.

    Literary giants like Faulkner and Hemmingway acknowledged their debt to mentors, but I suspect that most such debts remain secret and unpaid. The myth of the author as a solitary genius is very strong, and not to be diluted by the influence of others, however important the influence may have been. Thus the fate of the mentor may be invisibility and frustration, or a single line on the dedication page of a book. In retrospect, I would settle for that.

    April 23, 2008

    No Doubt (rant & rave)

    If the twentieth century was an age of doubt, the twenty-first is beginning to look like an age of certainty. Seldom have so many people in public life been so absolutely sure about so many things. Questions about science or morality or culture, no matter how profound and complicated, don’t faze them in the least: they just know the truth. Facts, evidence, and argument are irrelevant. Their first answer is always the right answer.

    This kind of certainty is enviable. Those of us intellectual weaklings who have doubts about everything, waste a lot of time and energy just trying to figure things out. We look for information, compare the sources, and think about the problem. Thinking is hard work, as any student will confirm. Even after putting in a lot of effort, we are often left with as many doubts as we had at the beginning, and sometimes more.

    Here are just four obvious problems that have me completely baffled:

    • How do you square respect for the right to life with killing people?
    • Why does more money spent on education result in worse student performance?
    • Are all the sovereign nations of the world really sovereign, or only one?
    • Why are so many people starving when the world has a surplus of food?

    I have dozens more, but you get the point. These are tricky questions. They give me a headache. But fortunately the people at the top have all the right answers, so I don’t have to think about them.

    History shows that certainty can move mountains. It was demonstrated during the single-minded communist regimes of Stalin and Mao, the Puritan theocracy of the 1600s in New England, and the medieval European church at the time of the Inquisition. They had no doubts or hesitations. They just got on with the job, doing what they knew was right. A bunch of liberal intellectuals would never have produced such dramatic results. If I had been a judge of the Inqusition confronted by (say) a heretic of the Manichaen persuasion, I would probably have said: “Interesting idea. Maybe he’s right,” and left it at that. Then, I suppose, I would have been next in line for the bonfire.

    The number of things we don’t know is overwhelmingly vast. Even mathematicians and physicists, working on the frontiers of knowledge, are hitting the wall. Their own research is too complicated for them to understand. Where does that leave the rest of us? Knowledge is growing fast, but ignorance is growing faster. This should make us more humble and tentative. But the opposite seems to be happening. Real ignorance seems to breed false certainty, at least among our leaders. Issues of life and death, truth and lies, fact and fiction are difficult and confusing for most of us, but not for them. They know.

    The desire for certainty is part of human nature. It’s a hangover from childhood, but some never grow out of it. Eric Hoffer, in a famous book of the 1950s, called them “The True Believers.” They will believe in just about anything: baseball teams, flying saucers, political parties, miracle diets – it doesn’t matter what, just so long as it takes away that vertiginous feeling of doubt.

    Most of the trouble in the world is caused by people who are sure they are right. Very little trouble is caused by people who have doubts. That’s why true believers worry me. I’m suspicious of anyone, no matter how powerful, whose daily vocabulary doesn’t recognize our common fallibility, who never use phrases like: “Sorry, I was mistaken,” or “I don’t know,” or (most encouraging of all), “Wait, I’ll have to think about it.”

    April 7, 2008

    Extreme Blogging

    The New York Times reported yesterday that bloggers are under stress. It seems than many of them stay at their keyboards at all hours of the day and night, trying to keep ahead of their particular game. Two famed bloggers, Russell Shaw and Marc Orchant, have recently died. Both of them were much younger than I, and a 41-year-old blogger just about survived a heart attack in December.

    This should give us pause. Blogging is clearly much more dangerous than we thought. I plan to step back a bit from my hectic schedule. It’s only thirteen days since I posted my last comment on this page, and now I’m rushing to do it again. At my age I must be careful. One more week and I should be sufficiently recovered to blog again, although heaven only knows about what.

    Next Page »

     

      Login